If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a cell tower could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.